Login | |

Acacia mearnsii

Evergreen tree, with dark-green bipinnate leaves and pale yellow spherical flower heads.

Scientific nameAcacia mearnsii De Wild.

Common names: black wattle, Australian acacia, green wattle, tan wattle

FamilyFabaceae (Leguminosae)

Status in Portugalinvasive species (listed in the Decreto-Lei nº 92/2019, 10 july)

Risk Assessment score: 27 | Value obtained according to a protocol adapted from the Australian Weed Risk Assessment (Pheloung et al. 1999), by Morais et al. (2017), according to which values above 13 mean that the species has risk of having invasive behavior in the Portuguese territory | Updated on 30/09/2017.

SynonymyAcacia decurrens var. mollis Lindl., A. decurrens var. mollis Willd., A. mollissima sensu auct, A. molissima Willd., Racosperma mearnsii (De Wild.) Pedley

Last update: 30/06/2021


How to recognise it

Tree up to 10 m high; branches with superficial furrows; young, golden apexes due to the numerous golden coloured hairs.

Leavesevergreen, dark green, finely pilosebipinnate, 3-14 cm long, with 8-25 pairs of pinnae, which in turn have 30-70 pairs of 1,5-4 x 0,5-0,8 mm leaflets; central rachis of the leaf with different sized glands that are irregularly distributed.

Flowers: pale yellow arranged in globular flower heads of 5-6 mm diameter.

Fruits: dark brown podscompressed, ± straight, constricted between the seeds.

Flowering: March to May.


Similar species

Acacia dealbata (silver wattle) is similar but has greenish-grey leaves and the rachis presents glands at the junction of each pinnae pair; the flowers are of a brighter yellow and more precocious in the seasonal cycle.

Drag the cursor over the image



left – A. mearnsii                right – A. dealbata

Characteristics that aid invasion

It reproduces by seed; it produces many seeds that remain viable in the ground for more than 50 years. The seeds are dispersed by wind, animals, or water. Germination is stimulated by fire.

The species also propagates vegetatively, sprouting vigorously from stump and roots.

Native distribution area

Southeast Australia and Tasmania.


Distribution in Portugal

Mainland Portugal (Minho, Beira Litoral, Beira Baixa, Estremadura, Ribatejo, Alto Alentejo, Baixo Alentejo, Algarve), Madeira archipelago (island of Madeira).


Geographic areas where there are records of Acacia mearnsii

Other places where the species is invasive

Europe (Spain, France, Turkey), South Africa, some regions in the USA, New Zealand.


Introduction reasons

For ornamental purposes and for tannin extraction.


Preferential invasion environments

Disturbed areas, watercourse banks and urban areas. It occurs from 0 to 850 m a.s.l. and withstands frequent frosts.


It presents a relatively limited distribution area in mainland Portugal.

Impacts on ecossystems

It forms dense populations inhibiting the development of native vegetation. In Portugal, it is not one of the most dispersed species, being known few (when compared with A. dealbataA. melanoxylon or A. longifolia) situations where these levels of impact are verified.

It produces a lot of nitrogen-rich litter, which promotes soil change.


Economic impacts

It has potential expensive control measures.


Natura 2000 Network habitats more subject to impacts

– Wooded dunes with Pinus pinea and/or Pinus pinaster (2270).

Controlling an invasive species demands a well-planned management, which includes the determination of the invaded area, identifying the causes of invasion, assessing the impacts, defining the intervention priorities, selecting the adequate control methodologies and their application. Afterwards it is fundamental to monitor the efficiency of the methodologies and recuperation of the intervened area as to perform, whenever necessary, the follow-up control.

The control methodologies used for Acacia mearnsii include:


Physical control

Hand pulling: preferential methodology for seedlings and small plants. When in more compacted substrates, pulling should be made during the rainy season as to facilitate the removal of the root system. It should be guaranteed that no main roots are left in the ground.

Cutting with brushcutter: preferential methodology for plants resulting from the germination that are still very small. It should just be applied on warm days as long as the security conditions are respected.


Physical + chemical control

Cut stump method: Preferential methodology for adult plants. Cut the trunk as close to the ground as possible and immediately (in the following seconds) apply herbicide (active substance: glyphosate) to the cut stump. Should latter on sprouting occur, these sprouts should be immediately eliminated through cutting, pulling or foliar application of herbicide (active substance: glyphosate); up to 25 to 50 cm high. Shoots of larger dimensions (from 2-3 cm diameter) may be ring-barked or else should be repeated the initial methodology (cut stump method).


Chemical control

Foliar application of herbicide: over recent sprouts (25-50 cm tall) or when high germination rates occur. Spray with herbicide (active substance: glyphosate) limiting as much as possible its application to the target species.

Stem injection: aplica-se a plantas adultas. Apply the herbicide directly on the vascular system by drilling holes (with a drill) 10 cm deep around the trunk and in each hole immediately inject (in the following seconds) the herbicide (1 ml) with a squirt bottle. The holes should be made at a height most comfortable to the operator, in a 45º angle (to avoid the herbicide’s runoff) and in intervals of 5-10 cm between them. The number of holes to make depends on the plant’s diameter.


Biological control

The weevil Melanterius maculatus Lea (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) has been used with success in South Africa. This species feeds off seeds of A. mearnsii, causing a reduction on the number of seeds in some areas, although the destruction level of the seeds in not yet very high.

The weevil Dasineura rubiformis Rübsaamen (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) has been used with success in South Africa. This species forms galls on the floral buds of A. mearnsii inhibiting the formation of seeds.

These agents have not yet been tested in Portugal as to verify its safety relatively to native species, so its use has not yet constituted an alternative in our country.


Prescribed fire

It may be strategically used to favour germination of the seed bank, e.g., after the control of adult individuals (with the adequate management of the resulting biomass) and the subsequent elimination of seedlings. This method provides an advantageous reduction of the seed bank, both by destroying part of the seeds and by stimulating the germination of the remainders.


Visit the webpage How to Control for additional and more detailed information about the correct application of these methodologies.

Agricultural Research Council – Plant Protection Research Institute – weed">Weed Research Division (2014) Management of invasive alien plants: A list of biocontrol agents released against invasive alien plants in South Africa. Disponível:  http://www.arc.agric.za/arc-ppri/Documents/WebAgentsreleased.pdf [Consultado 16/10/2014].



CABI (2012) Acacia mearnsii. In: invasive">Invasive species">Species Compendium. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Disponível: http://www.cabi.org/isc/ [Consultado 6/11/2012].





Dennill GB, Donnelly D, Stewart K, Impson FAC (1999) Insect agents used for the biological control of Australian Acacia species and Paraserianthes lophanta (Willd.) Nielsen (Fabaceae) in South Africa. African Entomology: Memoir no.1: 45-54.





Global invasive">Invasive species">Species Database (2012) Acacia mearnsii. Disponível: http://www.issg.org/database/species/ecology.asp?si=51&fr=1&sts=sss [Consultado 06/11/2012].





Marchante E, Freitas H, Marchante H (2008) Guia prático para a identificação de plantas invasoras de Portugal Continental. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, 183pp.





Pheloung, P.C., Williams, P.A., Halloy, S.R., 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management. 57: 239-251.